[MD] -elitist ideas
Arlo Bensinger
ajb102 at psu.edu
Mon Mar 19 13:12:06 PDT 2007
[Marsha]
You're answering a question with a question?
[Arlo]
I was trying to figure out what I was saying that was shocking you.
[Marsha]
In my little world, Quality/DQ is not moral in any way, not
'betterness, and not comparative.
[Arlo]
OK. In my little world, Quality/Value/Betterness all point at the
same "thing". They are not "subjective" nor "objective". They precede
the S/O dualism. That is, there is no "subjectivity" in the amoebas
response to biological value, or biological quality.
Quality is valuative, we experience "low quality" and we experience
"high quality". The amoeba moving away from the acid and the person
jumping off the hot stove just had a significant valuative
experience. S/O dualism and the ability to symbolically compare
represented experience comes later (and only for the person, not for
the amoeba).
Pirsig explains this better than I can. "The easiest intellectual
analogue of pure Quality that people in our environment can
understand is that 'Quality is the response of an organism to its
environment' (he used this example because his chief questioners
seemed to see things in terms of stimulus-response behavior theory).
An amoeba, placed on a plate of water with a drip of dilute sulfuric
acid placed nearby, will pull away from the acid (I think). If it
could speak the amoeba, without knowing anything about sulfuric acid,
could say, 'This environment has poor quality.' If it had a nervous
system it would act in a much more complex way to overcome the poor
quality of the environment. It would seek analogues, that is, images
and symbols from its previous experience, to define the unpleasant
nature of its new environment and thus 'understand' it." (ZMM)
Is the experience for the amoeba "comparative"? Not in the sense we
compare things, using symbols and such. But it is not a stretch for
me to call that experience "comparative". Its just that the only
things being compared is the near-immediate value of the environment
in terms of "betterness". When the amoeba finds a higher-quality
environment, it will stop.
Plus, I continue to not know how you can use "Quality" divorced from
"betterness". ("But some things are better than others, that is, they
have more quality." ZMM)
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list