[MD] -elitist ideas

MarshaV marshalz at charter.net
Mon Mar 19 12:45:01 PDT 2007


At 03:00 PM 3/19/2007, you wrote:


>[Arlo]
>So am I. Do you think Quality is subjective? How can Quality precede
>subject and objects but "value" be subjective? Does Quality not exist
>on the inorganic level, in your opinion?

Arlo,

Maybe I can suggest that on all four levels there is 
comparison/evaluation happening.  'Subjective' to me implies a human 
mind and can only be attributed to the two top levels.

Is this too simplistic?  Does it make sense?

m







More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list