[MD] -elitist ideas
MarshaV
marshalz at charter.net
Mon Mar 19 12:45:01 PDT 2007
At 03:00 PM 3/19/2007, you wrote:
>[Arlo]
>So am I. Do you think Quality is subjective? How can Quality precede
>subject and objects but "value" be subjective? Does Quality not exist
>on the inorganic level, in your opinion?
Arlo,
Maybe I can suggest that on all four levels there is
comparison/evaluation happening. 'Subjective' to me implies a human
mind and can only be attributed to the two top levels.
Is this too simplistic? Does it make sense?
m
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list