[MD] What's missing

[MarshaV]

Bo,

On the night of April 2nd, when the moon is high, go outside and 
stand in the light of the moon.  Look at the Moon.  Experience the 
Moon.  Become the Moon.

m





At 04:33 AM 3/29/2007, you wrote:
>Marsha.
>
>3/28 Marsha wrote:
>
> > Magnus and Bo,
> > It seems you have been discussing 'pointing at the moon' versus the
> > 'the Moon'.  The MOQ as Intellectual ideas is the 'pointing to the
> > moon'.  The Moon is a place where the rules of intellect are left
> > behind.  Where a dualistic language is left behind.
>
>I know from later posts that you two have found each other
>"under the moon" ;-) although I don't fully grasp how it disproves
>the SOL interpretation. Is it that "moon" is a concept and the light
>in the sky is "objective"?  If so you are stuck in intellect's S/O
>(concept/object) trying to escape it while simultaneously
>accepting its premises. AKA "mysticism".
>
>Look, the said "light in the sky" has undergone fundamental
>shifts, from ancient time (social age in our lingo) when the
>Ancients regarded it a god or goddess and had no discussions
>about any difference between its god-quality and the its sense-
>quality. Only with the intellectual level did the the said
>phenomenon become an object and the name a concept.
>
>So you see its not language which is dualistic - the said Ancients
>surely had language - it's the intellectual LEVEL which imposes
>its dualism on language - and all existence.
>
> > I have reconciled this by thinking of the MOQ levels as a triangle or
> > pyramid.  The mystic portion of the MOQ being the point and leading
> > edge in the Intellectual Level cutting into the future towards
> > freedom.   It's a visual that works for me.
>
>No bad model, but in that case the leading point has moved so
>far ahead that it can see the rest of the pyramid - including
>intellect as an edifice made up of static layers. I simply can't
>accept that a subset of the MOQ (the 4th static level) contains
>the MOQ.
>
>But I know only too well what causes it, namely intellect - to you
>all - is MIND, the realm of thinking. After the MOQ has rejected it
>mind goes as strong as ever, and nothing I say makes the
>slightest dent in the intellect=mind notion.
>
>
> > Bo, speak to me of the MOQ using the language of the Moon.  I've asked
> > you a few times.  Speak to me of the MOQ using a form of communication
> > that is above the Intellectual Level.
>
>Right, I have done so. Language is the "form of communication"
>that served the mythological reality, the SOM reality and now the
>Quality Reality which transforms the said realities into its own
>social and intellectual levels.
>
> > Or am I missing both your points.
>
>Obviously my point.
>
>IMO
>
>Bo
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>moq_discuss mailing list
>Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>Archives:
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/