[MD] NYT: The Feminine Critique
Arlo Bensinger
ajb102 at psu.edu
Mon Nov 5 07:26:58 PST 2007
[Akshay on Hunting Males and Gathering Females]
They are both necessary and complementary roles (ref. Yin and Yang
complementarity), without which the world cannot be sustained.
[Arlo]
I think the true spirit of feminism is not that all women should "be
like men", but these "complimentary roles" (as you call them) be
decided on mutual negotiation and not on a biological basis. When my
daughter was born, I willfully and respectfully assumed the role of
"housedad", because in my situation at the time it made much more
sense for her mother to continue her employment, both in terms of
overall income, my greater ability to step-out-step-back of the job
market and simply I wanted to be that caregiver 'more'.
Your greater point is far more important than the biological-gender
one here, and that is how nearly all families these days are
two-income families. We have devaluated the role of nurturer,
caregiver, childraiser, to one of frivolity and waste. And we, as a
culture, have set our sights on ever-increasing our income,
ever-growing our collections of stuff, ever-feeding our hunger for
more stuff, bigger boxes, and flashier gizmos. Our personal diasporas
are getting larger, we move away, seeking better employment, or
personal geographic happiness, and many no longer have access to the
shared caregiver net that was extended family. "Kin" as Pirsig notes
in ZMM. Indeed, "grandparenting" is also something we are replacing
with "active retirement".
So, while I think your premise is important, focusing on the biology
misses what's truly important. And that is the all families must find
balancing roles between labor and nurture.
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list