[MD] What is the MOQ?

[MarshaV]

At 10:21 AM 4/22/2008, you wrote:

> >>Marsha, and Everyone I think
> >>
> >>I Think I get what Bo means by this:  To a SOMist everything is subject
> >>and
> >>object. To a MOQist everything is Quality. If you ask both of them: "but
> >>hey, where did Objects/Quality come from?" both of them will answer that
> >>'it
> >>was always there', perhaps adding: 'waiting to be recognized by us
> >>humans.'
> >>
> >>That, and a religious understanding of things isn't part of a system, it
> >>is
> >>what makes a system possible.
> >>
> >>But I will ask Bo this then, how does the MOQ and the SOM differ?
> >>
> >>In fact, I will ask all of you that.
>
>
>
> > Hi Chris,
> >
> > Are you asking what is the difference between monism and dualism?
> >
> > Marsha
>
>Hello Marsha.
>
>No, no that's not what I'm asking. I don't really know what I am asking,
>except..
>
>In your book, is the MOQ a intellectual pattern of value? One that is of
>Higher Value than SOM?

Greetings Chris,

If it uses words to describe or define the MOQ, it is in most cases 
as a metaphysical theory, an Intellectual STATIC pattern of value, a 
pointing to the moon.

>And is there a difference between a "Quality Understanding of things" and
>the MOQ?  If so, what?

I'm not clear on what you are asking.  I'm just seeing words.

Marsha





Shoot for the moon.  Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars...