[MD] What is the MOQ?

[MarshaV]

At 10:21 AM 4/22/2008, you wrote:

 > >>Marsha, and Everyone I think
 > >>
 > >>I Think I get what Bo means by this:  To a SOMist everything is subject
 > >>and
 > >>object. To a MOQist everything is Quality. If you ask both of them: "but
 > >>hey, where did Objects/Quality come from?" both of them will answer that
 > >>'it
 > >>was always there', perhaps adding: 'waiting to be recognized by us
 > >>humans.'
 > >>
 > >>That, and a religious understanding of things isn't part of a system, it
 > >>is
 > >>what makes a system possible.
 > >>
 > >>But I will ask Bo this then, how does the MOQ and the SOM differ?
 > >>
 > >>In fact, I will ask all of you that.
 >
 >
 >
 > > Hi Chris,
 > >
 > > Are you asking what is the difference between monism and dualism?
 > >
 > > Marsha
 >
 >Hello Marsha.
 >
 >No, no that's not what I'm asking. I don't really know what I am asking,
 >except..
 >
 >In your book, is the MOQ a intellectual pattern of value? One that is of
 >Higher Value than SOM?

Greetings Chris,

If it uses words to describe or define the MOQ, it is in most cases
as a metaphysical theory, an Intellectual STATIC pattern of value, a
pointing to the moon.

 >And is there a difference between a "Quality Understanding of things" and
 >the MOQ?  If so, what?

I'm not clear on what you are asking.  I'm just seeing words.

Marsha


Hi Chris,

Yes, I do think the MOQ is of higher value than SOM because it is a 
monism rather than a dualism.

Marsha








Shoot for the moon.  Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars...