[MD] Dawkins quotes RMP on religion

[Joseph Maurer]

On Saturday 26 April 2008 3:09 PM David writes to Krimel:

>> [Krimel]
>> I don't think it makes sense to talk about DQ like this at all. DQ
>> is not a thing or a force. It is a property of Quality. It has
>> descriptive value not causal efficacy.
 
DM: I think DQ is more fundamental than SQ, as SQ is just a special
case of dynamic qualities, i.e ones that are repeating. That qualities
come and go and seem to interact with each other is what we mean
by force is it not?

Hi David and Krimel and all,

I side with Krimel on this point about DQ.  DQ is set apart from SQ which is
mechanical culture.  IMO DQ is the undefined aspect of proprietary awareness
(consciousness) which evolved as the social level.  In evolution both DQ and
SQ are equal.  My consciousness is not split into two it only has undefined
aspects.  Metaphysically this would be described as Conscious/Mechanical
aspects.

Joe



On 4/26/08 3:09 PM, "David M" <davidint at blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:

>>> [Krimel]
>>> I don't think it makes sense to talk about DQ like this at all. DQ is not
>>> a thing or a force. It is a property of Quality. It has descriptive value
>>> not causal efficacy.
> 
> DM: I think DQ is more fundamental than SQ, as SQ is just a special
> case of dynamic qualities, i.e ones that are repeating. That qualities
> come and go and seem to interact with each other is what we mean
> by force is it not?