[MD] What is the MOQ?

[skutvik at online.no]

Marsha

wrote on 26 April :

Bo earlier:
> >I have often used the ocean/wave metaphor, the waves are water
> >too, and in that sense the MOQ is a monism, but it's the waves
> >AS DIFFERENT from the smooth surface that counts, and makes
> >it a dualism.

> Where does the ocean end and the wave begin?  Where does the wave end
> and the smoothness begin?

You are right, waves are water undulations so in that sense  
...etc. but in that sense SOM is an monism too, and that it ain't 
supposed to be?  According to (the diagrams) in ZAMM there is a 
"reality" before the the S/O division and in accordance with the 
monism logic it's indivisible, indefinable ...etc.  My thesis is still 
that these diagrams are the source of the "Quality before the 
MOQ" fallacy. Think about it.

Bo