[MD] What is the MOQ?

[MarshaV]

At 03:16 AM 4/28/2008, you wrote:
>Marsha
>
>wrote on 26 April :
>
>Bo earlier:
> > >I have often used the ocean/wave metaphor, the waves are water
> > >too, and in that sense the MOQ is a monism, but it's the waves
> > >AS DIFFERENT from the smooth surface that counts, and makes
> > >it a dualism.
>
> > Where does the ocean end and the wave begin?  Where does the wave end
> > and the smoothness begin?
>
>You are right, waves are water undulations so in that sense
>...etc. but in that sense SOM is an monism too, and that it ain't
>supposed to be?  According to (the diagrams) in ZAMM there is a
>"reality" before the the S/O division and in accordance with the
>monism logic it's indivisible, indefinable ...etc.  My thesis is still
>that these diagrams are the source of the "Quality before the
>MOQ" fallacy. Think about it.
>
>Bo

Greeting Bo,

There is a difference between a discrete subject and object, and 
patterns of value, but I'll think about it.

Marsha







Shoot for the moon.  Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars...