[MD] Take things apart or build them?

[MarshaV]

At 02:22 PM 4/30/2008, you wrote:
>Hello,
>
>      This whole question about whether reality is
>dualistic, pluralistic, or however many parts one may
>want to separate reality into pieces that have no way
>of connecting and sharing an experience is the 'take
>events apart' or 'take things apart' approach.  Or are
>you the kind of person that tries to mix colors
>(yellow and blue makes green), share information, or
>take the 'build events' or 'build things' approach?
>Two approaches here:
>
>1 - take things apart
>
>2- build them
>
>
>It seems the separate of reality into parts that don't
>join, such as SOM, is the take things apart approach.
>Whereas, I see the monism of Quality as the build
>things approach.  This seems to be the baseline
>argument in most discussions.
>
>What do you think?
>
>SA
>

Greetings SA,

I love the easy questions.  One: take things apart, Two: build 
things, and  my very favorite: all of the above.

Being a born skeptic, the tough question is, 'How do I know?'  For 
instance, that form is emptiness, emptiness is form, and might as 
well add emptiness is empty, seems (though not as easily on paper) 
intuitionally correct.  BUT, how do I know?   How do you know?

Marsha





> 
>____________________________________________________________________________________
>Be a better friend, newshound, and
>know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it 
>now.  http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
>Moq_Discuss mailing list
>Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>Archives:
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/



Shoot for the moon.  Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars...