[MD] Take things apart or build them?

[Heather Perella]

Marsha:
> I love the easy questions.  One: take things apart,
> Two: build 
> things, and  my very favorite: all of the above.

SA:  Sure, but I'm not quite sure everybody does the
"all of the above" approach.  Ham and Bo have
concluded that an aspect of reality is separated into
parts with a dividing line that can't be bridged. 
They support SOM.  They like to break reality down
into parts that are separated.


Marsha:
> Being a born skeptic, the tough question is, 'How do
> I know?'  For 
> instance, that form is emptiness, emptiness is form,
> and might as 
> well add emptiness is empty, seems (though not as
> easily on paper) 
> intuitionally correct.  BUT, how do I know?   How do
> you know?

SA:  It's more of what I find myself doing.  Instead
of separating life into divisions that can't be
bridged, I find myself making bridges even between s's
and o's.  I call this bridge, at the moment, an event.
 

        Go with what your saying, come back, and let
me know how it went or maybe it lasts.  I don't know. 



SA


      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ