[MD] Direct Experience
Dwaipayan Lahiri
dlahiri at realsysadmin.com
Sun Aug 17 16:00:06 PDT 2008
On Aug 14, 2008, at 3:49 PM, Ham Priday wrote:
> also think a distinction should be made between experience and
> sensibility for epistemological clarity. I usually reserve
> "experience" for the awareness of external phenomena -- other
> persons, things, events, knowledge, and universal ideas. Although
> there's nothing wrong with saying "I'm experiencing a pain", since
> it's assumed that I'm not experiencing someone else's pain,
> technically pain is a proprioceptive sensation. So is Pirsig's
> "pre-intellectual experience." Properly speaking, qualitative
> values like joy, sadness, beauty, grossness, magnificence,
> triteness, goodness, and evil are "sensibilities" rather than
> experiences.
Consciousness has been varying defined/qualified in various ways. One
being that there is a supra-consciousness vs the mundane
consciousness of our everyday lives. Supra-consciousness will give
you the ability to experience everyone's pain, everyone's sorrow,
everyone's joy. That Consciousness taps into the Tao/Brahman (is Tao/
Brahman).
>
> Incidentally, I don't know how you distinguish "direct" experience
> from "indirect", but the essence of self-awareness is value-
> sensibility. Therefore, I would call the former "sensibility" if it
> falls in the category of Pirsig's "hot stove" analogy. As a
> general rule, concepts, sentiments, preferences, desires, fears,
> and resentments are all sensibilities. Quantitaive knowledge, such
> as factual information, physical relations, and numerical
> calculations, pertains to experience.
Samkhya Darsana (The Philosophy of Yoga) deals with this topic. In
Patanjali's Yoga Sutras he deals with the nature of Knowledge as
follows --
True Knowledge can be attained via Direct Perception, Inference based
on intuition and by the testimony of reliable sources (YS 1:7)
This Direct Experience in my opinion is the acquisition of knowledge
via Direct Perception. This is typically the atemporal, aphysical
knowledge. To understand this you have to shift your attention from
the layer of the flesh (Annamaya Kosha or the First Sheath of
Existence) to the subtler layers (Pranamaya, Vijnanamaya, Manomaya
and finally Anandamaya Koshas).
I refrain from trying to translate these into English because
translations/transliterations are futile -- English is incapable of
expressing these concepts.
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list