[MD] For Bo

[Heather Perella]

> SA previously:
>      I like that answer.  Good answer.  I understand now. 
> Thanks.
>      Another question, if you will.  Would you say the moq
> has an axiom
> or an axiom system?
> 
> Ron:
> That was it. " The accuracy of an intellectual
> understanding lies 
> within it's value"
> But that really isn't an axiom of assumption; it's
> more a pearl of
> wisdom, a "philosophers stone" if you will.
> Axioms are a kind of 
> absolutism, they are indicative of a sort of value
> rigidity. Drop
> axioms and value is where you recognize it. 
> per your aboriginal wisdom post.


SA:  Thanks Ron.  I appreciate your help.  I think this also shows how reality can be explained in similar ways, maybe not exactly the same way (the explanation), but with similar results or ground of understanding.  This is also why the moq espouses an understanding that is Amerindian, eastern asian, and western, etc...  It is also how I can get from quiet woods to an understanding that you have with your language/grammar understanding.  We are not restricted to using these ways, but you see what I mean.  It also has to do with how Campbell discussed a monomyth.  Etc..., etc...  

Thanks again.

quiet, formless
woods, form,
SA