[MD] For Bo

Peter Corteen psigenics at googlemail.com
Sat Aug 23 02:00:10 PDT 2008


Hi Ron,

you said:  'Drop axioms and value is where you recognise it'; that's almost
meaningless to me.

You'll recognise the wall when you walk into it. Is the wall an axiom or
merely a mental construct?

-Peter



2008/8/22 Ron Kulp <RKulp at ebwalshinc.com>

>
> SA:
>      I like that answer.  Good answer.  I understand now.  Thanks.
>     Another question, if you will.  Would you say the moq has an axiom
> or an axiom system?
>
> Ron:
> That was it. " The accuracy of an intellectual understanding lies
> within it's value"
>
> But that really isn't an axiom of assumption; it's more a pearl of
> wisdom, a "philosophers stone" if you will. Axioms are a kind of
> absolutism, they are indicative of a sort of value rigidity. Drop
> axioms and value is where you recognize it.
> per your aboriginal wisdom post.
>
> -woods
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- On Fri, 8/22/08, Ron Kulp <RKulp at ebwalshinc.com> wrote:
>
> > From: Ron Kulp <RKulp at ebwalshinc.com>
> > Subject: Re: [MD] For Bo
> > To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
> > Date: Friday, August 22, 2008, 7:12 AM
> > SA:
> > And since these axioms are limited in their understanding
> > and analytic
> > logic and SOM is built on these axioms, then analytic logic
> > and SOM are
> > incomplete in their understanding of reality.  Hence, there
> > are ways to
> > understand reality in other ways that are more complete.
> > By saying
> > "understand", I'm referring not only to
> > experience but an intellectual
> > way to "understand" reality that is not just
> > analytical logic and SOM,
> > and your saying that these other ways of intellectually
> > understand
> > reality are even more complete than analytical logic and
> > SOM - maybe
> > that's what your saying?
> >
> > Ron:
> > Perhaps they are perhaps they are not, either way it
> > emphasizes the
> > point
> > that MoQ and SOM are contemporary intellectual patterns,
> > useful in their
> > own ways but neither of them, or any such intellectual
> > understanding is
> > never
> > fully complete. The accuracy of an intellectual
> > understanding lies
> > within it's value.
> >
> >
> >
> > Moq_Discuss mailing list
> > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> > Archives:
> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>



More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list