[MD] Consciousness a la Platt

[Platt Holden]

SA:
 
> Platt:
> > What "blatant lies" do you think I have
> > perpetrated?
> 
> SA:  Well, I didn't use "blatant lies".  I said "deceive", but maybe their
> both mayapples.  I think the point I was making was Arlo asked you
> questions and you didn't answer them, and those questions are based on
> your 'evolve', 'need for an origin', and 'intention' comments.

Please jog my memory. When did I write "evolve," "need for an origin" and
"intention."

>  If you say
> these events happen, but don't provide an answer - without even an 'I
> don't know' comment, then what are you holding back?  Thus, why I grouped
> my answer with 'deception', 'hiding', or 'learning something'/'in
> transition'.

Do you believe that anyone here is duty bound to answer questions when he 
or she is described by the questioner as being a moron and a liar?

>      From my perspective, it's mainly been Ham, with his "consciousness
> evolves" comment and then his blatant disregard to comment upon this quote
> of his.  He probably doesn't even know what his own words mean.  It's his
> track record.  His 'mo'.

Without offering any evidence, you charge is ad hominem.  I'm surprised, 
SA. It's not like you to be like Arlo. 

Platt