[MD] The levels undressed

[skutvik at online.no]

Chris and Magnus

30 Aug. Christoffer Ivarsson wrote:

Bo before:
> >> BTW, what do you see as the first split? To some it seems to be
> >> DQ/MOQ but is supposed to be DQ/SQ no?

Then Magnus :
> > DQ/MoQ? I don't follow, do you mean DQ/Reality? But no, of course
> > the first split is DQ/SQ.

Chris:
> I think he means that people tend to view DQ as separate from the MOQ,
> and - in essance - make it to zenish, Bodvar has pointed out on many
> occations that DQ and SQ exists only when you look at the world
> through MOQ glasses. But of course metaphysical glasses are
> fundamental so..

Yes, some seem to envisage an even greater "MOQ" that looks 
like this: Quality=Reality/MOQ, while I maintain that the rock 
bottom divide is DQ/SQ. As Chris points out a metaphysics is 
supposed to be reality. Only with Aristotles did we get SOM's 
"Reality/Metaphysics". 

Bo.