[MD] The levels undressed

[Ian Glendinning]

Bo, Chris, Magnus,

No doubt S & D are the first split of Q.
Q is therefore the whole.

The key phrase Bo is "supposed to be".
How can a metaphysics and reality be one and the same thing.
One is "supposed to be" a representation of the other, and is a part
of that same reality.

Looking forward to reading Magnus' latest piece.
Ian

On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 2:24 AM,  <skutvik at online.no> wrote:
> Chris and Magnus
>
> 30 Aug. Christoffer Ivarsson wrote:
>
> Bo before:
>> >> BTW, what do you see as the first split? To some it seems to be
>> >> DQ/MOQ but is supposed to be DQ/SQ no?
>
> Then Magnus :
>> > DQ/MoQ? I don't follow, do you mean DQ/Reality? But no, of course
>> > the first split is DQ/SQ.
>
> Chris:
>> I think he means that people tend to view DQ as separate from the MOQ,
>> and - in essance - make it to zenish, Bodvar has pointed out on many
>> occations that DQ and SQ exists only when you look at the world
>> through MOQ glasses. But of course metaphysical glasses are
>> fundamental so..
>
> Yes, some seem to envisage an even greater "MOQ" that looks
> like this: Quality=Reality/MOQ, while I maintain that the rock
> bottom divide is DQ/SQ. As Chris points out a metaphysics is
> supposed to be reality. Only with Aristotles did we get SOM's
> "Reality/Metaphysics".
>
> Bo.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>