[MD] Trance state

[Ian Glendinning]

Understood Andre,

My comment (and Ron's) was aimed primarily at old hand Bo, who has
left us hanging at such critical points in debate too often ... anyone
is allowed to be too busy to spend time on MD (it is very draining to
be active the whole time, even if you have free time, I tend to be a
month-on month-off kind of pattern).

The frustration is the lack of acknowledgement for the point reached.
Thanks for yours. Even if Bo acknowledged he'd been given something to
think about it would be fine. But his silence sounds awfully like
ignorance, when he is clearly not too busy to continue corresponding
on MD.
Ian

On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 1:52 PM, Andre Broersen <andrebroersen at gmail.com> wrote:
> Ian:
>
> I am drafting this 5 minutes after Ron (X Acto) sent his, but holding
> it as a draft in case Bo (and/or Steve / Andre) actually responds in
> the "discrepancy" thread.
>
> Andre;
>
> Hi Ian, yes, it is sometimes a bit frustrating not to get an immediate
> response to previous ideas/interpretations forwarded. For my part, this is
> not because I am not interested or that I do not have any ideas. I really
> enjoy this forum because( as opposed to a round table discussion where in
> mid-sentence one can be shot down) one can let the other person's ideas sink
> in and formulate a response worthy of reply. So. nr 1, I am gratified to
> hear that you appreciate my input ( this may sound ingratiating but is not
> meant to) and 2, the discussion at this forum is really very overwhelming
> and 'pacey' (which is great but brings about situations you react to) and 3,
> I am very busy here at present doing loads of things on top of preparing for
> an end to my 3-year stay here in China. None of these are excuses but I hope
> you understand.
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>