[MD] The SOM/MOQ discrepancy.
Arlo Bensinger
ajb102 at psu.edu
Mon Dec 8 10:12:46 PST 2008
[Ham to Andre]
Man is not here by accident or freak mutations.
[Arlo]
Some clarity, thank you Ham. Some follow-ups.
1.) Is anything here by accident or freak mutations? I mean, would
you say "trees are not here by accident or freak mutations" or maybe
"The moon is not here by accident or freak mutations"? Or is it just
"man" that enjoys this status?
2.) Was man always intended? During the entire reign of the
dinosaurs, was there still intent to "one day" bring about man? Were
did this intent reside? Is this getting back to a "Primary Source"
that needed something to worship it? If so, why wait? Why create a
cosmos devoid of "man" for billions and billions and years, allowing
dinosaurs to reign unchecked for millions, if the sole goal all along
was to produce "man"?
Some unresolved questions.
3.) You had said previously that "consciousness evolves". You had
tried to clarify this by saying "creation is an actualized modality
of Essence". Can you verify for me that this means that the process
by which consciousness evolves is rendered by a "Primary Source" that
doles out improved models to subsequent generations, that this is why
our consciousness is "more evolved" than our ancient cavemen
ancestors (Essence simply gives us an updated model).
More soon, these are enough for now.
Arlo
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list