[MD] A fine mess

[X Acto]

Mel,
My understanding rests on the fact that being is composed of value
therefore I find it necessary to posit that value precedes being
in correspondence with Pirsig. While being may be seen as
interaction with value (value interacting with value) I hesitate
to use this for it seems to promote the conceptualization
of entity and seprateness.
thanks
-Ron




________________________________
From: ml <mbtlehn at ix.netcom.com>
To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
Sent: Monday, December 8, 2008 2:18:40 PM
Subject: Re: [MD] A fine mess

Interesting.

Although it seems that it might be more helpful
to think of it this way:

Being is interaction with value.

thanks--mel

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "X Acto" <xacto at rocketmail.com>
To: <moq_discuss at moqtalk.org>
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 10:31 AM
Subject: Re: [MD] A fine mess


> Truly my freinds, our society suffers from the "Myth of Reason"
> By emphasizing this realisation, by focus on the contextual,
> we find value as the locus of truth that "I am" is subordinate to.
> Being is subordinate to value.
> 
> This is not so much a metaphysic but an awakening
> 
> 
>      
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk..org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/