[MD] A fine mess

[skutvik at online.no]

Hi Ian

On 9 Dec. you said to Ron:
 
> Two great points in there, either of which I still live in hope of Bo
> noticing.

I'm an old man and can only manage it "once a day". Regarding the 
previous logic issue I can't see how it can be expanded. 2+2 is 4 in 
MOQ too, but it's premises brings an in-out-turn of many things. One 
major turn is  from SOM where intellect = mind to MOQ where its 4th. 
level = mind/matter distinction. As long as this isn't understood or 
accepted, the MOQ isn't understood.       

> (1) the social acceptance (received wisdom) angle of, err .. truth ?
> (the entanglement of the socio-intellectual - cultural context -
> levels) (2) the pointlessness of the metaphysical naming, when we are
> talking about pragmatism, particularly the kind of enlightened
> pragmatism we arrive at after the "experience" of such a huge amount
> of intellectal (and rhetroical) effort.

???????????????????????????????????

Bo