[MD] The SOM/MOQ discrepancy.

[ml]

Hello, Ham:
----- Original Message -----

<snip>
Ham:
 This is no great breakthrough, Krimel; Eastern mystics and Western
> theologians have accepted the concept of an immutable source for thousands
> of years.  Why should we reject this idea simply because we're opposed to
> the dogma of a "personal diety"?
<snip>

mel:
Not to be flippant, but in the light of the way
Dynamism is a part of these discussions,
maybe the way to look at the vanishing point
of regression is the:
Infinitely Mutable Source of Infinite Mutability.

...although that does not make a good acronym.
"May the:
IMSOIM, InMuS, InfMut, IMSo, etc. be with you."
(definitely clumsy)

Seriously, though, we seem to have exercised and conceit
by putting constraints on an effectively infinite universe and
beyond by dictating that it by unchangeable.

thanks--mel