[MD] The SOM/MOQ discrepancy.

[Ham Priday]

Hi Mel -- 

[Ham, previously to Krimel]:
> This is no great breakthrough, Krimel; Eastern mystics and
> Western theologians have accepted the concept of an immutable
> source for thousands of years.  Why should we reject this idea
> simply because we're opposed to the dogma of a "personal diety"?

[Mel]:
> Not to be flippant, but in the light of the way
> Dynamism is a part of these discussions,
> maybe the way to look at the vanishing point
> of regression is the:
> Infinitely Mutable Source of Infinite Mutability.
>
> Seriously, though, we seem to have exercised conceit
> by putting constraints on an effectively infinite universe and
> beyond by dictating that it be unchangeable.

Just to correct the record and avoid further confusion, it is the uncreated 
SOURCE that is absolute and immutable, not the created universe.

Essentially yours,
Ham