[MD] global warming scam?

[MarshaV]

At 12:27 AM 12/28/2008, you wrote:



>marsha:  And here's why extremes on both sides are a problem.  It 
>becomes time what???
>
>gav: wtf?
>
>hi there all you fruity bats....let's play some more.
>global warming...okay let's take a middle road - like k.rudd has 
>(k.rudd for the americans among you is the aussie pm. i know i know 
>- life outside the US - who cares!)
>
>k.rudd has adopted a goal of 5% decrease in emissions by 2020. which 
>is ACCORDING TO THE GREAT MAJORITY OF THE GLOBAL SCIENTIFIC 
>ESTABLISHMENT (slightly important point there kids) fucking suicidal.
>
>okay so maybe they are all wrong - who knows? it's possible. maybe 
>the whole warming thang *is* a scam. maybe everything is just fine 
>and we can continue as normal.....
>
>the world scientists' global warning to humanity was over 15 years 
>ago now and it was pretty much universal condemnation of current 
>energy/economic policy as the main threat to continued human 
>existence. nothing much has changed.
>
>so maybe platt is right. and maybe i'll trust the scientific 
>community. hey your pick: platt or science. can't have both.
>
>gav votes for.......science
>anyone else care to cast their ballot?


  Ah, yes, man is the measure of all things.  Individually, and 
everybody's right, nobody's wrong.  -   By the way, I wasn't choosing 
sides, I was just looking.  And do you know what?  I don't see much 
intelligence.   I came up here to paint, however did I get sidetracked?

And Gav, do you choose science when it comes to its corporate side?














.
.

Shoot for the moon.  Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars.........
.
.