[MD] Politics
Arlo Bensinger
ajb102 at psu.edu
Thu Feb 28 09:07:51 PST 2008
[Khaled]
Back to our citizens. When you are oblivious to where you are
physically, I mean not being able to point to a world map and say I
am here, it's only downhill from there.
[Arlo]
The bulk of our approach to education in this country is Fordist in a
post-Fordian world. Traditionalists argue that "because my daddy was
taught that way, my kids should be taught that way". Progressives
make the mistake of throwing every passing fad into the mix they can.
And teachers are overwhelmed, numb and caught between kids, parents
and bureaucrats. We teach for tests because that is all "No Child"
is, and that is what districts have to do. Gone are critical
thinking, higher level cognitive skills like synthesis, analysis and
evaluation (e.g. using Bloom's Taxonomy). The curriculum has largely
become piecemeal, with disconnected subjects with little perceived
relevance being jumped into and out of every fifty minutes. The
overwhelming majority of parents are only involved in their
children's schooling to complain about something, be it "evolution",
"an unfair grade", or when something goes wrong. We expect teachers
to deal with all sorts of problem behavior, but then cripple their
ability to do so.
When I lived in Chicago years ago, I overheard a college student in
the library of UC actually asking the reference desk for an atlas
"because she needed to find out where Israel was for her history
class". On one hand, I ask, how the hell does someone make it to the
college level without a basic understanding of where these countries
are. On the other, I know, that the impetus in American culture is
purely America-centric, we don't give a damn about the rest of the
world, and so why on earth should it matter. Back home, my mother
works with a mother who actually went to the school to demand her
daughter NOT have to learn a second language, telling my mom "if
English is good enough for me, it's good enough for the rest of the
world" (actual quote!).
Over the past decade, when I have been involved in instructional
design work and curricular issues, I have seen a slow trend (but not
without opposition) towards the type of constructivist learning
environments that challenge the Fordist "all students in neat little
rows, sitting quietly as the teacher fills their little mush-brains
with knowledge". I have seen schools struggle to adopt integrated
curriculae, to open up the typical "periods" to allow students who
are engaged in history or biology to continue to be so despite what
the little clock on the wall tells them they should suddenly be
thinking about, to approach larger questions critically and to find
meaning in what has typically been presented as acontextual,
irrelevant chunks of "facts" that are doled out like peas in a
daycare. And in many areas I see daily improvement and growth. But
what has to always be remembered is that "education" is a reflection
of the values of the culture. And I am not just talking about which
"facts" are valued. When parents become more involved, when learning
becomes more important than "passing a test", when we stop demanding
an arbitrary, externally imposed "progression" to learning, when the
home and the community value this, then the schools will ipso facto
be like this as well.
Now you got me on a rant. Sorry.
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list