[MD] S/O and Morality

[Platt Holden]

Another moronic response as anyone can plainly see.


> [Arlo had said]
> Another fine example of the moronic rhetoric this thread began by
> condemning.
> 
> [Platt]
> Same to you, pal.
> 
> [Arlo]
> Except I am not the one engaging in distortive rhetoric. But anyone 
> who can read can see that. Your "Pee Wee Maneuver" here is without merit.
> 
> [Arlo had said]
> Your rhetorical association between "nationalistic 
> blindness" and "national defense", as if the two are merely two 
> viewpoints on one approach, is not only outrageous, but when said in 
> response to everything I had written shows only the blatant 
> distortion wielded by those who attempt to use social-level 
> talk-radio rhetoric to attack and break down any reasonable dialogue.
> 
> [Platt]
> A moronic assertion.
> 
> [Arlo]
> Any one who can read, and who has seen your last few responses, can 
> see that this is a valid assertion. Any one just joining can easily 
> check the past few posts.
> 
> [Platt]
> If you have no national pride, why defend yourself?
> 
> [Arlo]
> And as if on cue you toss out yet another moronic response. Can you 
> point out where I said ANYTHING about having "national pride", let 
> alone implying it is a "bad thing"? This is the type of idiotic, 
> distortive, moronic rhetoric that is morally called for what it is.
> 
> [Arlo had said]
> We can take great pride in our defeat of Hitler, but until we 
> recognize and admit that Henry Ford is emblematic of the historical 
> foundation that created Hitler's power in the first place our victory 
> is only partial.
> 
> [Platt]
> What nonsense. Now Hitler's rise was our fault. And I suppose we 
> deserved to get hit by Islamic radicals.  Speaking of morons . . .
> 
> [Arlo]
> And a final example of the extreme moronic crap that comes from 
> talk-radio discourse. Yes, I am speaking of morons, Platt, and your 
> rhetoric evidences what you are.
> 
> Not only did I never say Hitler's rise was "our fault", but your 
> baseless and evil claim that "Arlo thinks we deserve to get hit by 
> Islamic radicals" demonstrates the EXACT kind of stupid discourse 
> that we must rebel against.
> 
> And if you think that Henry Fords receiving of the top Nazi honor for 
> his support of Hitler had NOTHING to do with Hitler's rise to power, 
> and was not emblamatic of the stage that many nations and individuals 
> outside Germany helped create, then you are worse than a blind fool. 
> You could start by reading William Shirer's award winning The Rise 
> and Falll of the Third Reich to gain a better understanding of the 
> international decisions and attitudes that led to the Reich, the 
> foundations and backdrop that was cast that not only enabled a Hitler 
> to rise to power, but like Henry Ford, but promoted it. But, hey, why 
> let a little thing like history get in the way...