[MD] S/O and Morality
Arlo Bensinger
ajb102 at psu.edu
Wed Jan 23 14:29:49 PST 2008
[Platt]
Another moronic response as anyone can plainly see.
[Arlo]
Classic Pee-Wee. Expected, since I knew you'd have no other option in
the face of substantive challenges to your inane and moronic
rhetoric. Its the Rush Limbaugh way.
Nothing to justify your moronic association of "national blindness"
and "national defense".
Nothing to justify your moronic insinuation that "Arlo thinks having
national pride is bad".
Nor anything to justify your moronic assertion that "Arlo thinks we
deserved to get attacked by Islamic radicals", or that "Arlo thinks
Hitler was our fault".
Nor even anything to counter the historians like Shirer who have laid
forth phenomenal insights into the stage on which Hitler rose.
Nope. Nothing.
Nothing but the classic, anti-intellectual, sophomoric and moronic
rhetorical devices of talk radio. The Classic Pee-Wee.
And as started this thread, I find nothing immoral about calling this
for what it is. Thanks for the lovely demonstration of the forms of
moronic discourse in question, from the distortive and outrageous
"And I suppose we deserved to get hit by Islamic radicals" to the
deceptive pairing of "nationalistic blindness" to "national defense".
To this final Pee-Wee. Your replies have been textbook in providing
the examples that you yourself ostensibly wanted to see.
Kudos.
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list