[MD] The Advancement of MOQ

[Christoffer Ivarsson]

Bo, you wrote:

>If you mean the MOQ flirting with mysticism (Buddhism) In my
>opinion: No!! There are too many on this discussion that yelps
>about Dynamic Quality as if some panacea, not having
>understood the first thing of the MOQ. It (the MOQ) is greater
>than anything in the sense of bridging the East-West
>(mysticism/rationality) gap

I fully agree with this, and frankly I don't understand why people would 
hold to a "mystification" of the MOQ. It is not necessary, and all it would 
do would be to change it into a (worse?) form of mysticism that has already 
been around for over a thousand years. Zen is all good and well, but it is 
not the MOQ. There the mystics have it right, if you try to define Zen it 
will elude you, and you will have missed the point, the MOQ however is a 
tool for our analytic minds. Perhaps "analytic minds" is not the best choice 
of words, but I trust you know what I am getting at.

So, It should definitely not be more associated with any mystic elements, 
but my question was rather: Should we proceed as did Voltaire? To fight 
ferociously and perhaps a bit single minded for our cause - sometimes there 
is Value in such a struggle, but I do not know about this. Mabye it would 
destroy more that it gains, and perhaps the MOQ is not suited for such a 
struggle - maybe this was the way of the old intelectual level to establish 
itself, and maybe (If indeed the MOQ is the next level) this way of 
establishing supremacy is not suited for the MOQ.

Thoughts?

Oh, and by the way, Karl XII fought at Poltava - besserwisser note =D

MVH Chris

PS. This SOL that you speak of- excuse my ignorance - what are you refering 
to?