[MD] The Advancement of MOQ
skutvik at online.no
skutvik at online.no
Wed Jan 30 10:00:58 PST 2008
Hi Chris
On 28 Jan. you wrote:
Bo earlier:
> >If you mean the MOQ flirting with mysticism (Buddhism) In my
> >opinion: No!! There are too many on this discussion that yelps
> >about Dynamic Quality as if some panacea, not having
> >understood the first thing of the MOQ. It (the MOQ) is greater
> >than anything in the sense of bridging the East-West
> >(mysticism/rationality) gap
Chris:
> I fully agree with this, and frankly I don't understand why people
> would hold to a "mystification" of the MOQ. It is not necessary, and
> all it would do would be to change it into a (worse?) form of
> mysticism that has already been around for over a thousand years. Zen
> is all good and well, but it is not the MOQ. There the mystics have it
> right, if you try to define Zen it will elude you, and you will have
> missed the point, the MOQ however is a tool for our analytic minds.
> Perhaps "analytic minds" is not the best choice of words, but I trust
> you know what I am getting at.
Great, but this has consequences, first of all that the DQ/SQ
divide is the Quality, not as so many of our "mystics" want it,
namely that the MOQ is a mere theory about Quality. An entity
that - theoretically - can be split in any arbitrary way - even the
S/O one - without "trouble". IMO this is deeply wrong, among
other things because a "Quality SOM" is just as bad as the
ordinary SOM. Well enough for now.
> So, It should definitely not be more associated with any mystic
> elements, but my question was rather: Should we proceed as didf
> Voltaire? To fight ferociously and perhaps a bit single minded for our
> cause - sometimes there is Value in such a struggle, but I do not know
> about this. ...snip
Voltaire was an SOM (intellectual) fanatic. We have concentrated
much on Descartes as the philosophical pioneer, but Voltaire
surely was the political one and the French Revolution the turning
point in intellect's struggle with society ... in Europe. Pirsig sees
the end of WW1 (President Wilson) as intellect assuming the top
political job in the US - Americans notoriously believes they are
the hub of the world you know :-) .
Now, should the MOQ proceed as did intellect? A most intriguing
question. You mention Voltaire I guess because you see him as
the inspirator of the French Revolution and the post-revolutionary
terror. Yes, that's right, but it was an avalanche that nothing could
stop and it resulted in a better world. I guess this is what goes on
to-day, Intellect has completed is mission in the West, but
presses relentlessly on into the social feudal Middle East. I'm
sure that most people in the remote valleys of Afghanistan regard
their existence as good, they "don't need no education", and hate
the intruding modernity, yet the avalanche can't stop.
OK I got side-tracked. You went on
> Mabye it would destroy more that it gains, and perhaps the MOQ is not
> suited for such a struggle - maybe this was the way of the old
> intelectual level to establish itself, and maybe (If indeed the MOQ is
> the next level) this way of establishing supremacy is not suited for
> the MOQ.
It looks like you understand, but I must repeat: Everyone around
this site regard SOM as a villain that has corrupted an innocent
but dynamic intellect. In other words, they see it as a mental cup
that can contain all kinds of "ideas" - SOM one idea, the MOQ
another - much like mind. But this is untenable, intellect is the
S/O distinction and it's a huge value, consequently it's no evil
that the the MOQ can push out of sight. The MOQ itself is no
intellectual pattern, it's "out of intellect" but no longer part of it,
rather the very "system" that has intellect as its highest static
good. S/O Metaphysics is bad but the S/O distinction is good.
The "mystic MOQ" (with a "dynamic intellect) that most people
believe is the true MOQ (that must be protected against this
"revisionist") is in fact SOM's tentacles refusing to let go. The
mystic MOQ is just a more subtle SOM, Quality the objective
entity that the MOQ is just a theory about. This is the sad state,
the MOQ is not ready to enter any struggle for supremacy against
SOM because SOM is still in place. I have tried to re-enact the
role of MOQ's "Voltaire", but ...it ain't easy.
> Oh, and by the way, Karl XII fought at Poltava - besserwisser note =D
Right, I should have checked, it was at Lützen.
MVH
Bo
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list