[MD] moq thought experiement 1.

[Marsha]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Heather Perella" <spiritualadirondack at yahoo.com>
To: <moq_discuss at moqtalk.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2008 6:00 PM
Subject: Re: [MD] moq thought experiement 1.


>
>
>> > SA previously:  I'm going to be blunt - the plains spoken, as if
>> we aren't, to get to
>> > what I'm saying - for you go on to say something
>> here I don't think has to
>> > do with what I posted.
>
> Marsha:
>> Maybe you know the meaning of this sentence, but I do not
>> find it plain-spoken at all.
>
> SA:  That's all I said.  I said I'm going to be plains spoken about this. 
> You said something, I think, that has nothing to do with what I posted.
>     Maybe I'm being a bit too much in my words, in other words, too 
> lengthy in how many words I use, and your being a bit too much into how 
> deep your trying to read into what I'm saying.
>

A apologized for misunderstanding your post.


>
>> > SA previously:  No and Yes.  I was saying that if this moq-forum
>> is a forum about
>> > morals (quality/value, you know), then how best to
>> examine them in these
>> > real time events brought up by Squonk, dmb, McWatt,
>> and what have you.
>> > What you might say is arguing is another's debate.
>>  Isn't this philosophy?
>
> Marsha:
>> Of course it can always be this or that.
>
> SA:  yeap, of course.
>
>
>> > Marsha previously:
>> >> By all means decide who is
>> >> right, and who is
>> >> wrong, and why?
>
>
>> > SA previously:  I'm not even focused on who's right and
>> who's wrong - at all.  That
>> > might happen, but it might snow tomorrow too.
>> It's about what we do
>> > everyday, and now something that is tied into everyday
>> life much more than
>> > brains-in-vats and even my abstractions from time to
>> time, arises from the
>> > earth and Horse steps in and says stop?  Yes... ?
>
> Marsha:
>> Yours is just one more opinion.  Late enough to sound
>> moralizing.
>
> SA:  This doesn't sound like anything that has to do with what I posted, 
> but not stopping you from talking.  I don't have a quibble with what you 
> say.  So, "of course".  Other than the "late enough to sound moralizing". 
> Was there a scheduled time and date we were supposed to meet?  Missed that 
> message.

Right.  You were away for four days.


> Marsha:
>> I have always thought Horse should have the last word
>> because he's the
>> moderator.  But maybe it should be you.
>
> SA:  Of course Horse is the last word.  I did write that post to Horse, 
> and asked him why.  So, again, we could say, "of course".

Of course.

>> > Marsha previously:
>> >> But I'd bet it's about feelings.
>> >> Anyway, sorry to be so
>> >> wrong.
>> >
>> > SA previously:  This might be a separation your delineating and
>> others delineate from
>> > their daily lives and what happens on this forum.  I
>> say no separation.
>> > Never has been one.
>
> Marsha:
>> Huh?
>
> SA previously:
>> When has anything NOT been about feelings?
>
> Marsha:
>> This is probably true.
>
> SA:  You might have just answered your own "Huh?" in this statement.

I didn't understand separation and delineating from daily lives.  I didn't 
understand it.  I could have just fudged it, but I thought I'd indicate I 
didn't get it.



> Marsha:
>> wood chipper,
>
>
> woodpecker,
> SA
>


toothpick,

Marsha