[MD] The Intellectual Gauntlet

[MarshaV]

David,

More disappointed at what?  I thought your remark was over the top.  If I 
was wrong in my interpretation and you want an apology...  I'm sorry.  I 
have no desire to argue with you.  I have no desire to prove you wrong.  I 
have no desire to prove I'm right.  I am often wrong, so again, I am sorry.

Marsha



> Marsha
>
> More disappointed.
>
> DM
>
>>
>> David,
>>
>> You must be right.
>>
>> Marsha
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "David M" <davidint at blueyonder.co.uk>
>> To: <moq_discuss at moqtalk.org>
>> Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 1:58 PM
>> Subject: Re: [MD] The Intellectual Gauntlet
>>
>>
>>> Hi Marsha
>>>
>>> Yes, in the context of us as MOQ critics of western culture who
>>> often ask what we can learn from the east, I was asking
>>> what the east can learn from the west for a change? Is that
>>> a bad thing? You might think the answer is no, maybe you should
>>> try answering the question rather than just chucking abuse and odd
>>> suspicions at the questioner, it's a shame don't you think? Of course,
>>> the second comment you quote is in the context of the problematic
>>> comprehension of the west known as MOQ, I kind of take that as a
>>> given round here, but happy to confirm that this criticism works, at the
>>> least, both ways. My point is to find where east and west might meet,
>>> but that that may require both to move.
>>>
>>> DM
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Marsha
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> A statement like "the eastern mystic may be happy to sit
>>>>>> meditating whilst the world
>>>>>> goes to hell." shows a depth of ignorance of an important half of the 
>>>>>> MOQ's East/West synthesis.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nagarjuna obliterates subject/object dualism in a manner that 
>>>>>> shouldn't be missed.  This leaves the air clean and fresh for a new 
>>>>>> world-view experience.  Many of the problems this list is having 
>>>>>> "defining things" would melt away.  The subject/object pov stays 
>>>>>> intact but can be seen as a workable method in a conventional world 
>>>>>> not reality itself.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I think the word 'may' in my proposition may have passed you by.
>>>>>
>>>>> DM
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi David,
>>>>
>>>> And I'm sure the next sentence, "Here is perhaps where the west can ask 
>>>> if the east needs to think again in more comprehensive way." was just 
>>>> as innocent.
>>>>
>>>> Marsha
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>>> Archives:
>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>>> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>> Archives:
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>>
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>>
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/