[MD] The Menu/Reality issue

[Krimel]

>[Marsha]
>Parse, knowing, concept are analogies and static patterns of value.
>
>[Krimel]
>You seem to be chasing your tail. A pattern is a concept, which is a
>pattern, which is a concept...
>
>[Marsha]
>Even 'experience' is an analogy.
>
>[Krimel]
>Analogous to what?

Marsha
Quality and experience are synonyms.  What I write will be 
analogues.  In dialog I'm trapped.  :-D  

[Krimel]
So experience and Qualities are analogies? I thought an analogy was a set of
similar relationships. It points to the similarities between disparate
patterns. If Quality and experience are synonyms what are they analogies of?

Marsha
And I won't chase my tail.  No need.

[Krimel]
Claiming that you are not chasing your tail does not make your path any less
circuitous.

Marsha
You are asking me to subordinate Quality to a language whose syntax is based
on subject and objects.  Isn't that a trap?

[Krimel]
I am trying to decode the meaning of the language you are using. As we are
not telepathic it would seem our options with regards to communication are
limited.
















.
.
The Universe is uncaused, like a net of jewels in which each is a 
reflection of all the others in a fantastic, interrelated harmony without
end.
.
.


Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/