[MD] Metaphysical issues: DQ

[Platt Holden]

{Chris} 
> The Question we need to focus on here is "what should we say about DQ in
> order to make the MOQ work best?"
> We want the MOQ to replace old SOM as a metaphysical basis for human
> activity, and thus it is of course crucial that the MOQ in no way I
> perceived as standing in contrast to scientific understanding and
> method.

Not to worry, Chris. DQ is what science calls "chance," "random," or 
"spontaneous."  Fits right into scientific understanding and method. As the 
astrophysicist Arthur Eddington said, "Something unknown is doing we don't 
know what." At least he admitted it. Many scientists won't. But that's 
their problem, not ours. 

Regards,
Platt