[MD] Metaphysical issues: DQ

Krimel Krimel at Krimel.com
Mon Oct 13 17:42:38 PDT 2008


God not only plays dice, He also sometimes throws the dice where they cannot
be seen. 
- Stephen Hawking

[Krimel]
I think your would be hard pressed to find physicists who don't have
something like this view.

-------------------------------

{Chris} 
> The Question we need to focus on here is "what should we say about DQ in
> order to make the MOQ work best?"
> We want the MOQ to replace old SOM as a metaphysical basis for human
> activity, and thus it is of course crucial that the MOQ in no way I
> perceived as standing in contrast to scientific understanding and
> method.

Not to worry, Chris. DQ is what science calls "chance," "random," or 
"spontaneous."  Fits right into scientific understanding and method. As the 
astrophysicist Arthur Eddington said, "Something unknown is doing we don't 
know what." At least he admitted it. Many scientists won't. But that's 
their problem, not ours. 

Regards,
Platt
  





More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list