[MD] The Quest for Quality
MarshaV
marshalz at charter.net
Tue Sep 16 00:10:04 PDT 2008
At 08:19 PM 9/15/2008, you wrote:
>[Marsha]:
>>My beef is your insinuation that Quality, which is beyond
>>definition, needs to be associated with words like: primary,
>>first, or purpose. To call Quality the primary source is an
>>attempt to make it static, turn it into a static pattern of value.
>>You go too far.
>
>Ah, yes. The infamous and ill-conceived "static/dynamic" split.
>(I might as well get this off my chest as well.) Patterns, like
>movement and change, are differentiated events which only occur in a
>relational system. Relation is the nature of physical reality which
>is secondary to the primary source.
Relation and change represent reality's empirical nature.
>I never understood why the Pirsigians insist that their fundamental
>reality must be dynamic, while its derived patterns are
>static. This seems illogical to me. Even in the mysticism of the
>Orientals, what is absolute and whole is unchanging, whereas the
>mind interprets it as a flow of pluralistic events.
This statement is way too general for understanding. I doubt that
you have a full understanding of Eastern mysticism or its
teachings. Even within Buddhism there is still a debate concerning
whether there is really 'two truths' or one.
>You see, Marsha, for the essentialist Essence is static and
>immutable, impervious to the conditions of finitude. It is
>existence which is differentiated and transient. And this is
>because the locus of subjective experience -- individuated awareness
>-- is detached from the essential source, thus limited in its
>perspective. In biblical terms, we "see through a glass,
>darkly." What we see is a finitely differentiated "reduction" of
>the absolute source.
>
>Tell me, Marsha: Does Pirsig acknowledge DQ as the primary
>source? IS there a primary source in the MoQ? If you can't answer
>this affirmatively, then I would submit to you that the Quality
>hierarchy has no fundamental reality and is merely a paradigm for
>experiential existence.
RMP states that Quality is indivisible, undefinable and
unknowable. Quality is beyond conceptualization. I think it would
be safe to state that experience is the primary source of patterns.
Marsha
.
.
Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars.........
.
.
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list