[MD] Ironistic Metaphysics

[skutvik at online.no]

Ian and Ron

14 Aug. Ian :

> Bo, you sir, are the master of misinformation and a hack. Simply
> muck-spreading a meme.

Thanks a lot, but you bark up the wrong tree. I haven't said a thing 
about Relativity's weirdness, just that the Lorentz equations are used 
for switching between Newton physics and  Relativity and this is a fact 
regardless of what Ron says. He quoted Wiki himself: 

    "In physics, the Lorentz transformation precisely describes 
    how, according to the theory of special relativity, two observers' 
    varying measurements of space and time can be converted 
    into each other's frame of reference ....." 

and it says exactly that even "precisely". Today's physicists do this 
without stopping to think about relativistic weirdness seen from 
Newtonian grounds and vice versa, but when conditions are extreme 
only the former calculations work, elsewhere the Newtonian ditto does 
the job. It brings space crafts to their destinies, but when it comes to 
black holes and such ... alas. There is something similar regarding 
Quantum Physics and Newton's, but I'm a bit "rusty" here.  

The assertion that the SOL is a "Lorentz transformation" between 
SOM and MOQ (between MOQ and its intellectual level) is valid. 
Pirsig's (inorg.+ bio.=objects ..etc.) is a  formula  to link SOM and the 
MOQ, but it fails on several points ... and when Pirsig got more and 
more problems with this he just skipped SOM. But that's impossible, 
SOM or intellect is our static abode, only when things gets "extreme" 
we must apply the MOQ and then some transformation procedure is 
necessary.        

Bodvar