[MD] Marsha's Relativism
Matt Kundert
pirsigaffliction at hotmail.com
Fri Aug 21 17:34:24 PDT 2009
John said:
Words mean what they mean by reason of a negotiation
between two or more. Words mean just what the worder
intends when the worder is talking to himself.
Matt:
I think you're right (and the best philosophies of language
are working out the systematic consequences of this, like
Robert Brandom), but think of this distinct possibility--what
if the worder herself isn't sure what she intends? Some
people might think that's just plain incoherence, babble or
something, but I don't think so--I think many of the greatest
lines we repeat to ourselves, the genius behind them wasn't
totally sure what she meant.
John said:
Philosophy uses words which get their meaning from
dictionaries which get their definitions from common usage in
works of literature which come from an author's head.
Matt:
That's funny, and I take your point, but I think the great
philosophers were as creative and poetic as the great writers
one finds in Literature Departments, as opposed to Philosophy
Departments.
For instance, drawing together the last two things, when Kant
introduced "Vorstellung" in the Critique of Pure Reason, which
we translate as "representation," I don't think even he knew
quite what he exactly meant, and it was absolutely a term of
art (even if German itself is richer for words English renders as
"representation," meaning he already was working with a more
refined pallet in that particular case). If Kant had lived to read
P.F. Strawson, I think he would have learned a lot about what
he had meant.
Matt
_________________________________________________________________
Get back to school stuff for them and cashback for you.
http://www.bing.com/cashback?form=MSHYCB&publ=WLHMTAG&crea=TEXT_MSHYCB_BackToSchool_Cashback_BTSCashback_1x1
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list