[MD] What is SOM?

[X Acto]

John,
 yup,
it all seems to revolve around what frame of reference you hold to.

three stooges example

mo larry and curly are hanging dry wall,

Mo tells curly to start nailn

curly grabs a nail from the box and exclaims "hey mo! the head on this nail is on
the wrong end!"
Mo replies, "you idiot! ....   that nail is for the other wall"


.-R





 


----- Original Message ----
From: John Carl <ridgecoyote at gmail.com>
To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 3:34:51 PM
Subject: Re: [MD] What is SOM?

Ron]

>
> it, itself, is not a bona fide metaphysic. and it would be more precise to
> call
> what we mean by the term "subject/object metaphysics" as simply pure
> objectivism.


As in, the self arises in a naturalistic evolution from the objectified
cosmos and is just a collection of matter and dna that is made up of stuff
wherein consciousness is merely an illusion these particles of matter have
obtained somehow.

Yeah, that does make sense.  That's the overall impression I get from the
official worldview, with anything more nebulous than that assigned to world
of "wacky and mystic religious experience" which is entirely subjective (and
thus wrong)


John
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/