[MD] new blog

[Michael Poloukhine]

> Paco:
> I think an MoQ guided theology is possible. 
MP: I'm not sure I'd use the word "theology" but this is also where I'm going with 
all this. It would need to be a theology without words in effect, but IMO it can be 
done. Taoism sure comes close, and it did it without MoQ. 

After all... what MoQ solves is the discord between science and mysticism, no? 
Science can't cross the chasm to mysticism without demystifying whatever it 
touches. Mysticism can't be scientific without losing its ability to be mystical. 
MoQ bridges the gap by allowing for an understanding of reality which accounts 
for both using one language.

> Paco:
> It is in the realm of the intellect, but not in the realm of reason
> as a function of intellect.
> The intellect can directly apprehend and intuit.
MP: Yes. I stand corrected, thank you. I have trouble disassociating SOM and 
the 4th level. (Not looking to start that debate in this thread! Ignore! Ignore!)