[MD] The Science of Red

MarshaV marshalz at charter.net
Wed Feb 4 05:30:42 PST 2009


At 07:47 AM 2/4/2009, you wrote:
>Hi Marsha,
>
>
>>It seems to me, religions reify experience into religious objects.
>>Science reifies experience into scientific objects.   The MOQ seems 
>>to point to the merit of the actual experience, and the experience 
>>prior to concepts.
>
>I'm not sure I understand what the point of this thread is. Are 
>there questions you have about the experience of red? You seem to be 
>unimpressed by the answers Krimel presented that science has about 
>red, but you haven't asked any questions beyond, what does science 
>say about red?
>
>Best,
>Steve

Greetings Steve,

My question was about what science tells us about the _experience_ of 
red.  This was just an auxiliary question.  The primary question was 
also about _experience_:  'It is my impression that the mystical 
experience is without self and objects, in the land before 
language.  How does science deal with that?'

Not to worry.  I'm perfectly willing to let the subject drop.  I can 
ponder it on my own time.


Marsha






_____________

QUESTION EVERYTHING!!!

    




More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list