[MD] Another parallel

[X Acto]

dmb says:
On what grounds are you declaring Ron's questions illegitimate and
undeserving of an answer?

Marsha:
They do not reflect my thinking.

To think too carefully tramples my experience.  Don't you get it?  -  I want
the MoQ to become the prevailing world-view in the West, with high quality
having a part in every decision made by every man, woman and child.

Ron's questions are nuts, and I will not give them serious consideration.
"Are his books worthless".  Ron's got some screws loose.  Ron may just be an
alpha-male needing some followers.  It ain't me babe!

Ron:
in MoQ thats actually a compliment, 
but

It really  says something when you defend your double standards with discrediting those 
questions as insane.

It really does, it says you are too afraid that you may be mistaken to even consider discussing it.

You allways fall to the gender issue when you feel intellectually threatened. and you play
that card so very well.

instant relief from any sort of accountability for your words.

and I'm not thinking I know you, I just know your devices.

they are used by almost every religious fundementalist I ever 
had an intellectual discussion with.




Rons original Question:
MoQ being indefinable, how may it have
more explanitory power if one's focus is 
on killing those explainations?

 Are his books worthless since there are works of SOM?

Ron clarifies:
Marsha the position you maintain is that you condemn anything DmB or I say
as said in SOM language and therefore is SOM thinking and academic.
I replied that Pirsig used SOM language and used academics as refference
and support for his ideas, but you do not consider his books to be SOM thinking.
I ask what the distiction is.
I asked you that since you feel that all language is SOM and is SOM thinking
and we should kill SOM thinking, How would a you suggest then that, in your
own words "the MoQ to become the prevailing world-view in the West, with high quality
having a part in every decision made by every man, woman and child." 
How do you suppose to do that when one may not speak of it or express this
desire intellectually.