[MD] NAP
blue-jay maple
libertytree at mail.com
Mon Jun 8 06:53:11 PDT 2009
Yes he did, but they aren't objective. They are moral values like
I've said in numerous posts since the beginning of this exchange.
:-)
Nick
> Ron, you've made an excellent point!!!
>
>
> At 09:34 AM 6/8/2009, you wrote:
> > Nick, You use the terms "Justice" and "liberty" as though they
> > stand for objective universal truths. MoQ rejects objective
> > universal views. -Ron
>
>
>
> > Â ________________________________ From: blue-jay maple
> > <libertytree at mail.com> To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org Sent: Monday,
> > June 8, 2009 9:31:25 AM Subject: Re: [MD] NAP > Ron: > I have
> > only these quotes, which I agree with, to provide an >
> > understanding about > why I think the idea of natural law and MoQ
> > conflict. > by Pierre Charron in his De la sagesse (1601): "The
> > sign of a > natural law must be the universal respect in which it
> > is held, for > if there was anything that nature had truly
> > commanded us to do, we > would undoubtedly obey it universally:
> > not only would every nation > respect it, but every individual.
> > Instead there is nothing in the > world that is not subject to
> > contradiction and dispute, nothing > that is not rejected, not
> > just by one nation, but by many; equally, > there is nothing that
> > is strange and (in the opinion of many) > unnatural that is not
> > approved in many countries, and authorized by > their customs."
> > Nick: What Pierre Charron doesn't realize is free-will. Natural
> > Law is completely about free-will. This is why when natural law
> > is understood those that violate it are brought to justice.Â
> > Justice is born of Liberty. Pierre Charron seems to be talking
> > about Newtonian applications of natural law which completely
> > perverts it's real meaning. Ron: > And > "Aristotle > Greek
> > philosophy emphasized the distinction between "nature" > (physis,
> > ÏúÏιÏ) on the one hand and "law", "custom", or >
> > "convention" (nomos, νóμοÏ) on the other. What the law >
> > commanded varied from place to place, but what was "by nature" >
> > should be the same everywhere. A "law of nature" would therefore
> > > have had the flavor more of a paradox than something which >
> > obviously existed." Nick: Liberty is a natural law. It makes no
> > bias except to bring justice. Justice to those that violate
> > liberty, life (person), and property. That's it so it's not a
> > very long understanding to master. So since liberty molds no
> > bias various social customs flourish everywhere. Billions of
> > people on this earth demonstrate how liberty does not bias and
> > thus why the unique diversity in the billions. thanks Nick -- Be
> > Yourself @ mail.com! Choose From 200+ Email Addresses Get a Free
> > Account at www.mail.com Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo,
> > Unsubscribing etc.
> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> > Archives:
> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ Moq_Discuss
> > mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> > Archives:
> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>
>
> _____________
>
> "He who neglects the present moment throws away all he has."
> (Friedrich von Schiller)
>
>
>
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>
--
Be Yourself @ mail.com!
Choose From 200+ Email Addresses
Get a Free Account at www.mail.com
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list