[MD] (no subject)

[David Swift]

Marsha you posted Sun, 08 Mar 2009 17:17:

 

 

>[Marsha]

>I am not a Materialist.  RMP has stated that the MOQ accepts Materialism as
long at it is understood to be a set of >ideas.  I am curious about science
and Krimel's views for that reason, but I think he doesn't understand his
scientific >pov as a set of ideas but thinks of them as reality itself.  So
yours and Krimels explanation are conventional >explanations that reflect
the questions being asked by a particular group of scientists and reflect
the method being >used to 

>discover the answer.   Those three little sentences of Krimel's had 

>me confused so I thought I'd ask for clarification.  Your explanation was
interesting too.

 

 

Happy day Marsha:

 

I'm a married grandfather still working full-time, reading and writing so
the pace you people keep seems blistering to me. Finally someone (you) asked
a few questions that, for me at least, had straightforward answers. I've
read ZAMM and Lila and a few online essays but I only understand about half
of what I read. I'm getting it more and more often and I'm optimistic about
the future, the MoQ seems to be a workable metaphysics for my belief system.
I just feel a kinship with Krimel because while we seem to disagree about
most things, we share a frustration with MoQ's mystic assertions. -david
swift