[MD] (no subject)

[MarshaV]

At 07:24 PM 3/8/2009, you wrote:
>
>
>Marsha you posted Sun, 08 Mar 2009 17:17:
>
>
>
>
>
> >[Marsha]
>
> >I am not a Materialist.  RMP has stated that the MOQ accepts Materialism as
>long at it is understood to be a set of >ideas.  I am curious about science
>and Krimel's views for that reason, but I think he doesn't understand his
>scientific >pov as a set of ideas but thinks of them as reality itself.  So
>yours and Krimels explanation are conventional >explanations that reflect
>the questions being asked by a particular group of scientists and reflect
>the method being >used to
>
> >discover the answer.   Those three little sentences of Krimel's had
>
> >me confused so I thought I'd ask for clarification.  Your explanation was
>interesting too.
>
>
>
>
>
>Happy day Marsha:
>
>
>
>I'm a married grandfather still working full-time, reading and writing so
>the pace you people keep seems blistering to me. Finally someone (you) asked
>a few questions that, for me at least, had straightforward answers. I've
>read ZAMM and Lila and a few online essays but I only understand about half
>of what I read. I'm getting it more and more often and I'm optimistic about
>the future, the MoQ seems to be a workable metaphysics for my belief system.
>I just feel a kinship with Krimel because while we seem to disagree about
>most things, we share a frustration with MoQ's mystic assertions. -david
>swift


David,

Don't let Krimel fool you, he's a wizard, as mystical as the 
next.  The patterns are interesting, story telling at its finest, 
having both happy and sad endings, so keep those scientific questions 
and answers flowing.


Marsha




.
_____________

Shoot for the moon.  Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars.........
.
.