[MD] Skepticism&Behaviour

[X Acto]

Bo,
what pisses me off is that you developed the germ of a pretty
interesting concept 12yrs ago and have rested on it. pitched
a tent on it, drew a line in the sand and declared yourself
king. You distort and twist Robert Pirsigs words and eveyone
else who does not agree with you. You are either dilusional
or a compulsive liar.
What pisses me off is after following along with your thread with DmB
where he points to each flaw and reason for it, inch by inch and handed
you your own ass as a crown to wear for all to see, you declare victory
and vindication. I mean, what the heck?
There is a line between steadfast and ignorance and I think you
crossed it years ago.
But you are all correct, if I do not like what you say I should
just stop reading you posts. But you are so bombastic that
it becomes difficult at times.
I will not interupt again even if I do think you are talking out your
ass.

the emperor indeed, has no cloths.

-Ron




________________________________
From: "skutvik at online.no" <skutvik at online.no>
To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 3:29:55 AM
Subject: Re: [MD] Skepticism&Behaviour

Michael and Andre

17 March.

Michael writes:
> The degree of personal vindiction in here is thick enough to cut with
> a knife. Its too bad.. It makes thinking things through with words in
> here *very* difficult. Why can't we all agree to respect each others'
> views, listen to ideas and thoughts, debate them, even with vigor, but
> not make it *personal*? There are some here who seem to have no
> problem doing so.

Hi Michael 
If this pertains to Ron Kulp's "blow-out" I certainly agree about 
listening to ideas, but never mind him. Not to get personal, but he 
is desperate for attention and when I don't bother with him he gets 
pissed. I've been through such before and am impervious, if only 
the MOQ (as I interprets it) serves me I'm fine.  

Andre writes:
> I know that Bodvar can look after himself but do want to say this: I
> cannot think of anyone here on this Discuss being more committed to the
> MoQ than he is. He has defended his SOL/ MOQ position for more than ten
> years now and has copped flack from many. He has also pulled many into
> line when he felt they were straying too far from the MoQ path. And has
> been appreciated for that! 

Thanks a lot Andre, I may be single-minded to the point of 
monomania and have "pestered" this discussion with the SOL 
interpretation of the MOQ for X years, but for the reason that it IS 
the MOQ and by now there is no opposition to it except when 
people has to take a stand, then they either "don't understand" or 
"the MOQ is Pirsig's property" *).  

*) Note that Pirsig always says "..the MOQ", never "my MOQ"

Bodvar







Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/