[MD] The Brujo

MarshaV marshalz at charter.net
Sat Mar 21 14:25:47 PDT 2009


At 05:11 PM 3/21/2009, you wrote:
>[Marsha]
>If you look into the causes and conditions of a pattern, then their
>causes and conditions, and theirs, and theirs, and theirs,,, you can
>only come to the conclusion that all leads to the net-of-jewels, but
>of course even causes and conditions are empty of inherent existence
>and conceptually constructed.  So...
>
>[Krimel]
>That image of Indras net works so well because it is so precise.
>The human nervous system is just such a net.
>Pulses of energy flowing through uncountable pathways.
>Infinitely interconnected in currents of:
>Sensation, emotion, locomotion, ingestion, digestion, elimination...
>That wet jeweled net of nerves shimmers with:
>Recollections, reflections, and projections.
>Association and habits cluster and strobe
>Into patterns of rhythm and mood.
>
>And always at the edge is the fizz of conversion.
>Light becoming sight and warmth.
>Force becoming sound, touch, motion and space.
>Chemistry becoming taste and smell and itch.
>They are all fish flopping in the net.
>We send them swimming into streams of consciousness
>Reformatted and transformed into living ideas flowing through
>The intricate structures of our hopes and dreams.
>
>Being "empty of inherent existence" doesn't diminish their power.
>A rose by any other name can still prick your finger.
>
>But that is just the incurable romantic realist in me.


Krimel,

I'm repeating a question from a few posts ago because I want you to answer:
      Is there even one thing that is not dependent
      on being conceptually constructed
      and established
      by conventional agreement?

The incurable, romantic Krimel is most charming, but I would like you 
to answer the question.


Marsha







.
_____________

Shoot for the moon.  Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars.........
.
. 




More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list