[MD] Patterns s/o or relationship???

[MarshaV]

At 07:16 AM 5/5/2009, you wrote:
>On 5 May 2009 at 6:56, MarshaV wrote:
>
> >
> > Are all physicist as enlightened as this one???
> >
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bRduOpj1R7c&feature=related
> >
> >
> > 4:05 minutes
>
>Marsha,
>
>Don't you think this physicist would be more enlightened if she had
>acknowledged the role of values in the structure of the universe?
>Emphasizing relationships and interconnections as she does strikes me as
>assuming an S/O premise.
>
>Thanks for the link.
>
>Platt

Hello Platt,

MINDWALK is a wonderful film.  Somewhere she states that there are no 
objects just relationships between processes and patterns of 
probability.  That seems to fit the MOQ.  But do try to watch the 
whole movie if you get a chance because it speaks of the three 
perspectives: the politician, the poet and the enlightened 
physicist.  Her evaluation of science made during a lunchtime 
discussion is so appropriate.



Marsha






.
_____________

Shoot for the moon.  Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars.........
.
.