[MD] in defence of the "relative"

[Steven Peterson]

> It's a figure of speech, like I am a thought-flow of ever-changing,
> interrelated and interconnected, inorganic, biological, social and
> intellectual, static patterns of value responding to Dynamic Quality.
> Within the MoQ Dynamic Quality and static quality arise co-dependently, like
> within Buddhism form and emptiness are co-dependent.

Fine, but this isn't what anyone but you means by the term "relativism."


>I like the
> phoenix-like rise of relativism again.

Again? When was the hay day of relativism?

> Protagoras might be pleased.

He might if he ever used the term or endorsed relativism as the term
is now used.