[MD] in defence of the "relative"

[MarshaV]

> Marsha:
> It's a figure of speech, like I am a thought-flow of ever-changing,
> interrelated and interconnected, inorganic, biological, social and
> intellectual, static patterns of value responding to Dynamic Quality.
> Within the MoQ Dynamic Quality and static quality arise co-dependently,
like
> within Buddhism form and emptiness are co-dependent.

Steve:
Fine, but this isn't what anyone but you means by the term "relativism."

Marsha:
I'm a relativist, naturally then the meaning would be relative to the
context of my patterns of value.

I would like to know what _everyone_ but me means by the term
"relativism"???  Then tell me _how you know_ what _everyone_ but me knows,
since knowing is a private affair???