[MD] in defence of the "relative"

[X Acto]

Marsha,
Just can't honor your own agreements can you?
I thought we agreed to stop posting for today?

a rhetorical ploy I see, to mount another arguement based in semantics.

NOW definitions are your basis of dispute.? for someone who doesent respect
definitions or find them relevent you are going to have an awfuly hard time
finding anyone on this forum to take you seriously.

DQ is indefinable therefore  being self-sufficient and free of external references 
or relationships.

DQ  is generally believed to be both universal in nature and constant in time.

DQ has no restriction, exception, or qualification.

DQ is Existing or occurring without interruption or end: 
ceaseless, continual, continuous, endless, eternal, everlasting. 

 stands apart from a normal or usual syntactical relation with other 
words or sentence elements .
of, pertaining to, or characteristic of all or the whole: universal experience. 
 
But if you want to take RMP literally, when he refers to DQ as a constant
then the literal definition of a constant is "changeless". But we all understand
that DQ isn't changeless, in fact DQ is everchanging.